Xeon -VS- Xeon
Monday July 13th, 2009

Here’s something new for you: an Intel Xeon E5405 @ 2.0 GHz with 12 MB cache and 1333 MHz FSB is not the same as an Intel Xeon E5405 @ 2.0 GHz with 12 MB cache and 1333 MHz FSB. “Uh... what?” Yes, exactly, that’s what my co-worker Thom and I thought as well. To the untrained eye, this would seem like a steaming pile of bullshit, but unfortunately, it is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Allow me to explain.

Two weeks ago we ordered a new web server. Since we’re going to do clustering, it seemed logical that we get the exact same server as we already had; so we would have two identical servers doing the clustering. The new setup would be running on the Microsoft Windows 2008 Web Edition X64 operating system; the same operating system I’m going to run on my own server (which, by the way, is almost done Bigsmile) So this morning, Thom and myself fired up the new server with the Microsoft Windows 2008 Web Edition X64 DVD in it, and…

0x3E: MULTIPROCESSOR_CONFIGURATION_NOT_SUPPORTED

What the hell? Shocked A blue screen of death during setup? That can’t be good… Neutral A quick search on the error code told me that it means that the processors are not the same. “For example, a Pentium processor and an 80486 processor”, as Microsoft puts it. But I’m pretty sure that we have two identical processors: two times the Intel Xeon E5405 @ 2.0 GHz with 12 MB cache and 1333 MHz FSB. It turns out that there are multiple revisions of the E5405, and Windows 2008 regards that as non symmetrical multiprocessing.

A bit of research later the cookie was cracked. It turns out that one of the processor we were using, a Xeon 5405 of the sub-type “SLBBP”, was designed in August 2008; which was later than the BIOS (which was of 2007). Which in turn meant that the BIOS version that we were using does not recognize this sub-type of Xeon 5405 because it doesn’t know of its existence. An update to the latest BIOS fixed the problem. All in all it was an interesting challenge. Smile

Filed under: tech, at work.
Sorry, there are no comments on this story yet.
Post a comment